4 ms·

>the old guard of free speech and privacy activists on the internet has long gone, drowned by a sea of unprincipled populist reactionaries which is an unnecess

• stinkbeetle 1y ago
  > >the old guard of free speech and privacy activists on the internet has long gone, drowned by a sea of unprincipled populist reactionaries > which is an unnecessary ideological divide if your concern is free speech and privacy; What do you mean by this, an unnecessary ideological divide? > too bad the old guard of activists chose sides and alienated additional support for their cause. What sides did they choose and whose additional support did they alienate?
  • throwaway290 1y ago
    I guess "The old guard of free speech" went to be rightie libertarians
    • stinkbeetle 1y ago
      As a group, those who bang the free speech and privacy drum be seen as being more to the right than 20 years ago, but I doubt it is significantly because individuals changed their other political opinions. More because some of the group dropped out as they have been silenced by fear or just changed their outlook on it as political landscape has changed. Also in some part because those remaining in the group are just viewed as being more to one side of the political spectrum than they used to be simply because of this view.
      • fsckboy 1y ago
        I parsed this entirety as a single noun cluster: "the old guard of free speech and privacy activists on the internet" and to me that can be summed up as "the EFF", and the EFF is decidedly left whinge, and does not attract the support of others who are concerned about free speech. free speech on the pre-web internet didn't really need a group, it was a given and generally accepted by all parties
        • stinkbeetle 1y ago
          But in that case, the EFF didn't go to be rightie libertarians. They if anything may have gone further left, it's just that they no longer champion free speech. Which is basically what I said, just applied to the group rather than individuals.
  • watwut 1y ago
    If the "rightie libertarians" from sibling is correct, then it actually describe the dynamic I have noticed. It is free speech as long as you are politically right, no matter how far extreme right you are or what you are saying. But, if you are left or oppose the far right, then criticizing those is not free speech, but rather a restriction on it. Suddenly you should shut up, all sorts of additional rules apply to you. It is wrong to argue with far right, to say things that are uncomfortable for them or call them names, call them nazi even when it is clearly the case. But if you are just a little radical feminist, you are valid target for any amount of abuse which suddenly counts as free speech. Your leftist or feminist speech does not count as valid free speech. Eventually, it started to look like "free speech" is tactically used expression to create an asymmetry and applies only to certain ideas. Or certain people ideas.
    • stinkbeetle 1y ago
      I don't understand what you're getting at. You're saying some "dynamic" of people you have noticed do not really support free speech in some cases? Lots of people don't support free speech. My original post bemoaned exactly that.
      • watwut 1y ago
        I am saying that "I support free speech" ended up associated with "I am pro far right, but do not want to openly admit so, but I will gladly accept suppression of left, progressives, liberals and anyone who criticizes right". And that eventually we realized that "old school free speech groups" just wanted to shut up opposition to far right.
        • stinkbeetle 1y ago
          It ended up associated with the far right, by people on the left who are against free speech I suppose, yes. > And that eventually we realized that "old school free speech groups" just wanted to shut up opposition to far right. That's untrue.
          • 1y ago
• tremon 1y ago
  At least the old guard never spoke in riddles.