I, for one, fail to see how this would gratify anyone's intellectual curiosity [0]. This article details facts that are uncontroversial and already covered in

I, for one, fail to see how this would gratify anyone's intellectual curiosity [0]. This article details facts that are uncontroversial and already covered in the original article. The added precisions don't change anything to the story. (Some people at) Samsung first goofed (misclassified reporters as supporters) then went postal instead of making up for it (threatened to leave them 6000+ Km from home on their own devices). Unacceptable behavior at the individual level, PR blunder at a larger one. Nothing in the article submitted here chalenges that. Folks, please read the articles before upvoting. -- [0] http://ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html http://ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html