4 ms·
I think that's what this is, the 4k people in NASA probably never would have quit (great benefits or whatever), maybe the strategist at the top (whether they ar
by TechDebtDevin 1y ago
I think that's what this is, the 4k people in NASA probably never would have quit (great benefits or whatever), maybe the strategist at the top (whether they are right or not) think its better for this talent to be concentrated at private firms? And tbf, the private sector does move fast :/
- ineedasername 1y agoThere is no strategist at the top thinking about where this talent is best positioned to do good work.
- TechDebtDevin 1y ago[flagged]
- ineedasername 1y agoI guess I was thinking more the larger DOGE project, because this isn't just NASA as such, this is the model it followed across the board-- State department, Nuclear safety, lots more, and someone else in these threads pointed out that tons of the people whose programs were cut were working on programs no private sector player will care about-- too niche, too pure research.