3 ms·
That's the way it is with tech reporters, the other side of the story is always never revealed. Imagine, if this guy hadn't published this article? I, as an ave
by neya 14y ago
That's the way it is with tech reporters, the other side of the story is always never revealed. Imagine, if this guy hadn't published this article? I, as an average reader would have thought Samsung is a scumbag company.
I don't support Samsung nor am I against them, just that we need to take anything that comes from a Tech Blogger/Journalist with a pinch of salt. Because, they know their audience is huge and they can manipulate anything to their advantage (For eg: Page views, popularity)
Actually, I lost faith in fair journalism after Techcrunch's posts a few months back. So I always wait for the other side of the story to be published.
- megablast 14y agoI am not sure this adds anything. I got all this from the original articles. He was clearly labelled wrong, either due to a mistake on his behalf or on Samsung's. If he new he certainly should have fixed it before he left. If he didn't then, what can you do? Stranding someone in a foreign city is never a solution.
- new299 14y agowell the story still doesn't add up as the original article said the blogger /had/ registered as a reporter. To be honest I get the impression that this article is manipulating the reader for page views.
- aptwebapps 14y agoThe original article claimed that the bloggers had repeatedly insisted on being reporters - not that they were unaware of the distinction. This writer either missed that or is ignoring it as inconvenient.