2 ms·
My mistake. You are absolutely correct on the Shield. The P320 striker still has more stored energy to dissipate in a striker-safety failure. Ironically, this
by calmbonsai 1y ago
My mistake. You are absolutely correct on the Shield.
The P320 striker still has more stored energy to dissipate in a striker-safety failure.
Ironically, this was a deliberate feature of its design submission for the M9 replacement program. In theory, this allows for more flexibility in trigger pull design (the trigger has to do less work) for even greater modularity in the FCG and less occurrence of light-primer-strikes.
- PenguinCoder 1y agoThe M9A4 is an amazing weapon, both in handling and design. It's heavy, sure, but that makes subsequent shots more accurate, less recoil. Different firing mechanisms though and to be fair I haven't shot the P320. But I love my M9.
- calmbonsai 1y agoI've only ever shot one on the range, but concur with the lack of recoil and easier follow-up shots. I can do hammers (controlled pairs) far easier than with a Glock 19. Ian just posted a follow-up video too: https://youtu.be/rjEhgXAALL8 https://youtu.be/rjEhgXAALL8