5 ms·
Yeah good point. Pulling the trigger in a glock does pull back the striker a decent bit, whereas in the 320 it barely does it at all. My main point is that in
by everyone 1y ago
Yeah good point. Pulling the trigger in a glock does pull back the striker a decent bit, whereas in the 320 it barely does it at all.
My main point is that in the army, how many instances has there been of someone using their sidearm in combat, ever?.. I think safety should be the priority for them.
- giantg2 1y ago"My main point is that in the army, how many instances has there been of someone using their sidearm in combat, ever?" Often enough that they carry the extra weight. If it wasn't useful, they wouldn't carry the weight. We can also look at history, such as why the 1911 was selected.