2 ms·
We’re already most of the way there. There’s the da Vinci Surgical System which has been around since the early 2000s, the Mako robot in orthopedics, ROSA for n
by throwup238 1y ago
We’re already most of the way there. There’s the da Vinci Surgical System which has been around since the early 2000s, the Mako robot in orthopedics, ROSA for neurosurgery, and Mazor X in spinal surgery. They’re not yet “AI controlled” and require a lot of input from the surgical staff but they’ve been critical to enabling surgeries that are too precise for human hands.
- andsoitis 1y ago> We’re already most of the way there. They’re not yet “AI controlled” and require a lot of input from the surgical staff but they’ve been critical to enabling surgeries that are too precise for human hands. That does not sound like “most of the way there”. At most maybe 20%?
- throwup238 1y agoIf you consider “robotic surgeon” to mean fully automated, then sure the percentage is lower, but at this point AI control is not the hard part. We’re still no closer to the mechanical dexterity and force feedback sensors necessary to make robotic surgeon than we were when the internet was born. Let alone miniaturizing them enough to make a useful automaton.