3 ms·

I can read what you wrote. You said that the evaluation duplicate something. Only thing they duplicate was the possibility of key firing. You must be referring

by nabla9 1y ago

I can read what you wrote. You said that the evaluation duplicate something. Only thing they duplicate was the possibility of key firing. You must be referring to that. They were not able to duplicate physical malfunction.

lazide 1y ago
They absolutely were able to duplicate elements of physical malfunction.
- nabla9 1y ago
  Yes. "elements" of physical malfunction, not the malfunction. That means they were able to individual safety mechanism fail, but not all of them. The intact gun would not fire all by itself if it was hammered in the test.
  - lazide 1y ago
    And yet, it did in reality. And there were clear manufacturing defects found when looking at the gun.
    - nabla9 1y ago
      You started with "the FBI was able to duplicate the ‘spontaneous firing of a chambere" And we end with perfect social media claim: "I believe it did happen in reality". I rest my case.
      - lazide 1y ago
        Bwahaha, sure dude. That’s totally what is happening.