I kinda agree on overall sentiment but it’s important to write it down: we went from 1. Court doing legislation by making decision on important topics, coming

I kinda agree on overall sentiment but it’s important to write it down: we went from 1. Court doing legislation by making decision on important topics, coming with reasoning, mostly building on previous reasoning and gradually changing things 2. Court makes a decision and then just build up a reasoning to support it, sometimes completely off 3. Court makes a decision without reasoning at all I think 1 is reasonable, with 2 being bad and 3 being ugly.