4 ms·
I disagree. The EULA is an extremely elegant solution to activate an organization's legal team to help their procurement team sponsor Open Source projects.
by robmensching 1y ago
I disagree. The EULA is an extremely elegant solution to activate an organization's legal team to help their procurement team sponsor Open Source projects.
- kvemkon 1y agoKeeping downloads/installation behind EULA seems controversial (with all the discussed pros and cons). But prohibiting (or even making it illegal?) to open an issue seems to disrupt how free software communities work. Of course you are free to delay feedback for e.g. 2 weeks (see free access to lwn.net) or not to answer at all or to mark such an issue and move it to discussions but not to limit feedback to your project in such a way.
- robmensching 1y agoYou should read the EULA. You'll find it doesn't say anything about the issue tracker. The EULA is actually a very standard software license that basically says if you use the software and you make revenue, you need to pay the fee.
- account42 1y agoAnything that activates an organization's legal team is a great way to get developers to look for alternatives. No one wants to involve legal.
- robmensching 1y agoWe used to say the same thing about Open Source licenses, and that changed. The long-term hope is that enough projects adopt the Open Source Maintenance Fee, or something like it, that it becomes the norm for companies to support the Open Source projects they depend upon. And you can say that will never happen. But the only way it will _definitely_ never happen is if we don't try... and choose to keep burning out Open Source maintainers.