4 ms·
I agree dataclasses are a better alternative when you want a class that represents data :) > There are typed dicts where you specify field names and the respec
by ozkatz 1y ago
I agree dataclasses are a better alternative when you want a class that represents data :)
> There are typed dicts where you specify field names and the respective key types
The only way to achieve this that I'm aware of is PEP 589: subclassing TypedDict. Which I believe negates the argument in the post.
- Arch-TK 1y agoI don't think using TypedDict to create a type hint is against the spirit of the post. Although reading a lot of what has been written here, it seems people aren't really getting the spirit of the post in the first place.