3 ms·
Not only does Sig deny that a problem exists, it denies these incidents are happening. I'll never buy another Sig. They've burned bridges IMHO.
by sparrish 1y ago
Not only does Sig deny that a problem exists, it denies these incidents are happening.
I'll never buy another Sig. They've burned bridges IMHO.
- giantg2 1y agoAdd to that they have issued a voluntary trigger system, but not a recall. Meaning they won't admit the problem (required for a recall) but acknowledge a need for a change. Even with the upgraded FCU (which all the military guns should have) there are still reports of this issue occurring.
- Analemma_ 1y agoIt’s arguably even worse than that: their entire PR strategy around this issue has been not just denial but “accuse everyone who says the gun has a problem of being Woke Communist Gay Liberals out to destroy America”. If you’re not up to speed with the P320’s issues, it might sound like I’m exaggerating: I promise I’m not, you can go look up their press statements. I’d call it shameful behavior, but it’s increasingly SOP from a class of people who have deliberately exorcised their ability to feel any shame.