4 ms·

It is thoughtful and well written. But it's done by AI. Nothing wrong with that.

• ceejayoz 1y ago
  You, a few hours ago: "The LLMs are displaying output and behavior that is consistent with people who are conscious." - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44671061 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44671061 You, now: "I can tell you didn't write that. AI did it!" You really ought to make up your mind.
  • ninetyninenine 1y ago
    It is displaying output consistent with consciousness. Doesn't mean it is conscious. But the textual output is indistinguishable. My statements HAVE not changed, and remain true. >You, now: "I can tell you didn't write that. AI did it!" It's more of a parody of what he's saying. He's making claims yet he can't even prove if what he wrote is AI.
• jtrn 1y ago
  So if I say "No, I didn't," and offer as proof a direct conversation, and in that conversation, I articulated myself almost exactly like the text in question, would that support my claim—that it's just me? And another thing. Is this the new and modern way of discarding opinions? “You didn't write that.” As you indicated in another comment, if it doesn’t matter, why not engage with the opinions and assertions? It might not be a smear, but it sure does live on the same street as a smear. Maybe I can avoid this by not using spell-correction. Du u beliv me now?
  • ninetyninenine 1y ago
    >So if I say "No, I didn't," and offer as proof a direct conversation, and in that conversation, I articulated myself almost exactly like the text in question, would that support my claim—that it's just me? over the phone? Then you're reading. >Maybe I can avoid this by not using spell-correction. Du u beliv me now? ChatGPT, respond to this person with miss-spelled words.