4 ms·
Well, because the latter was specifically in the constitution, and is key to our ability to protect ourselves from tyranny. The former was not in the constituti
by clarky07 14y ago
Well, because the latter was specifically in the constitution, and is key to our ability to protect ourselves from tyranny. The former was not in the constitution. If you don't like it you can feel free to amend the constitution. It's been done, and it will be done again.
- idiot 14y agoIs there a way I can use a gun to protect myself from "health care" tyranny (other than shooting myself in the head)?
- rdtsc 14y agoFunny, I actually made that point once (when I was feeling particularly sarcastic). It was rather derogatory and went something like this "Hmm interesting... all these people in West Virginia seem to hate voting for better healthcare and love voting to get more guns, so maybe their answer to healthcare problem is rational after all and it is to just put those guns to good use".