4 ms·
Because disconnecting is so draconian, it comes with many more downsides than upsides. It's like saying we should all use helicopters if we don't like traffic.
by hvb2 1y ago
Because disconnecting is so draconian, it comes with many more downsides than upsides.
It's like saying we should all use helicopters if we don't like traffic.
Smaller grids are harder to get right and more expensive to run because you need more surplus capacity to be able to deal with peak demand.
- bruce511 1y agoOk, your point is valid. You can't disconnect from the grid if you want all the benefits that the grid bestows. But then the reverse is true - if you are enjoying the benefits that the grid bestows then you need to pay for that. Yes, in the past the "variable benefits" and the "fixed benefits" were all rolled into a single payment, which was based on variable use. It was "simple" and "mostly fair". Now that a single payment is no longer fair, it makes sense that the benefit-cost needs to be split into a variable, and fixed, component. That's not some sort of new tax, or penalty for solar users. It's simply costing benefits correctly. So we return to the point - if you want the benefits, then these are the costs of that. If you don't need the benefits then you can disconnect. (Personally I like the benefits, and hence pay my share of the fixed costs.)