> Forgejo PR managed to twist that good announcement into seeming as a conflict of interest, because the "Gitea" name was reused for two different concepts. Now

> Forgejo PR managed to twist that good announcement into seeming as a conflict of interest, because the "Gitea" name was reused for two different concepts. Now that it's CommitGo as the (legally independent) contract development agency, it's much clearer. There is a Gitea company as well but it just needs to hold trademarks and domain names and cloud stuff. Isn't the Gitea company for-profit? Wasn't the leadership committee restructured to mandate half of its members are elected by the for-profit? Browsing the blog archives, there doesn't appear to be any indication that the concerns that were brought up around the incorporation of the for-profit have been resolved.