3 ms·
Not a different person "discovered she has a sizable interest in All U Chart, Inc., the company that holds the IP for ICEBlock" I'm not sure what hen's employ
by readthenotes1 1y ago
Not a different person
"discovered she has a sizable interest in All U Chart, Inc., the company that holds the IP for ICEBlock"
I'm not sure what hen's employee contract reads.
There are some limitations on US government employees engaging in political action though (Hatch act).
Perhaps hen sent a text relating to All U during work hours?
- heyoni 1y agoSince when is dissemination of publicly facing information considered political action under the Hatch Act? The latter requires the person to use their influence or be on duty for it to count. The raids being reported by the app aren’t using insider information, they’re in progress and out in the open. This situation is pretty clear cut. The administration isn’t being coy about purging anyone they think might be less than blindly loyal.
- shkkmo 1y agoAFAIK, ownership interest in a company doesn't violate any of the Hatch restrictions, even on the "further restricted" category of employees. So unless she took specific political actions while on the job, using her authority, or using federal resources, this is not a Hatch violation.
- dragonwriter 1y ago> There are some limitations on US government employees engaging in political action though (Hatch act). In both terms, the Trump Administration has been full of top-to-bottom, flagrant violations off the Hatch Act by loyalists.