> In and of itself own, as quoted by OP, it’s not meaningful. This is an overly literal, pedantic, and ungenerous interpretation of what I said. Clearly the a

> In and of itself own, as quoted by OP, it’s not meaningful. This is an overly literal, pedantic, and ungenerous interpretation of what I said. Clearly the actual numbers as well as the base rates for the relevant groups are necessary to meaningfully interpret the statistic, but I was hinting at a similar case after describing the logic for the original case, not exhaustively describing the similar case.