3 ms·
> It's really not, things can be powerful and easy to use. I'd even say some parts of ffmpeg are well designed in this way like `ffmpeg -i ./video.mp4 ./video.w
by Sesse__ 1y ago
> It's really not, things can be powerful and easy to use. I'd even say some parts of ffmpeg are well designed in this way like `ffmpeg -i ./video.mp4 ./video.wav` working is well designed.
I'd argue that even this command line isn't well-designed at all; it should be `ffmpeg video.mp4 -o video.wav`. How is it sane that anything without an -i in front is an _output_ filename?
- ycombiredd 1y agoIt's not an output filename.. The -i is the input, the .wav is the output filename in that example.
- Sesse__ 1y agoYes? That's not in conflict with anything I said.
- ycombiredd 1y agoYou're right! I misread your "without" as "with". I need better glasses, or reading comprehension.