4 ms·
$4m for 36 RVs seems like a pretty good deal. Why not spend $44m and handle all 400 of them? Surely they will spend somewhere between $4m and $44m trying to ef
by monster_truck 1y ago
$4m for 36 RVs seems like a pretty good deal. Why not spend $44m and handle all 400 of them?
Surely they will spend somewhere between $4m and $44m trying to effectively force this 2 hour limit which will not result in 0 RVs where they don't want them
- potato3732842 1y ago>Surely they will spend somewhere between $4m and $44m trying to effectively force this 2 hour limit which will not result in 0 RVs where they don't want them They'll make it back on the other end by engaging in revenue enforcement against box trucks and other legitimate business as the rule seems very clearly crafted to apply to them too.
- ahmeneeroe-v2 1y agoReally great deal for the RV residents! Not so much for taxpayers.
- lotsofpulp 1y agoHow much for the next 400? And the 400 after that? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Induced_demand https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Induced_demand
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- lazide 1y agoDo that, and next year you’ll have 800.
- kelseyfrog 1y agoAt that rate, in 11 years more people will be living in RVs in SF than in buildings.
- lazide 1y agoHave you seen SF property prices? If allowed, it could actually happen.
- kelseyfrog 1y agoMarket realism: if this is what the market decides, then who are we to force it to decide in a non-optimal way?
- indoordin0saur 1y agoAnd then the next year 1600. By the late 2050s you'll have more RVs than people on Earth and by 2072 their mass will become so great as to collapse the planet into a black hole!
- bookofjoe 1y ago>The Tragedy of the Commons https://math.uchicago.edu/~shmuel/Modeling/Hardin,%20Tragedy%20of%20the%20Commons.pdf https://math.uchicago.edu/~shmuel/Modeling/Hardin,%20Tragedy...
- rayiner 1y agoTo be clear, that’s trash pickup and other services for the RVs, not the cost of the RVs themselves. That’s an insane price tag.