4 ms·
You have to own a car, though. The state makes you buy car insurance because you can do a lot of damage to other people and their property with a car. They own
by dwwoelfel 14y ago
You have to own a car, though. The state makes you buy car insurance because you can do a lot of damage to other people and their property with a car. They own the roads, so they're responsible for making sure you can pay for that damage.
Texas, for instance, doesn't actually make you buy insurance. You only have to prove that you can be financially responsible for the damage you could cause [1].
Why is this relevant? You made the claim that "The sole purpose of the mandate is to make free-riding on the insurance market unlawful"
The medically uninsured only pose a financial threat to themselves. It's only through laws that make taxpayers responsible for the medical costs of the uninsured that they pose a threat to the rest of us. This mandate won't change anything in that respect. It will just make the line from taxpayer money to person who can't pay for his medical bills harder to follow.
[1] http://www.dmv.org/tx-texas/car-insurance.php http://www.dmv.org/tx-texas/car-insurance.php
edited for clarity
- startupgrrl 14y ago>The medically uninsured only pose a financial threat to themselves Uninsured Joe has an undiagnosed medical condition which causes him to black out but won't get it checked out because he knows he can't afford it, and it doesn't happen too often so maybe it'll go away. Joe blacks out while driving to his third part time job and slams into another car, killing himself and rendering the other car's passengers permanently incapable of working. You were one of those passengers. What just happened?
- tptacek 14y agoThe laws making the rest of us responsible for the uninsured aren't really optional, so it's probably better to just reason about this problem as if the uninsured were just intrinsically a financial risk to us.