4 ms·
It was due to a contractor that sold his password for peanuts. Not much opacity here. They shoud stop relying on poorly paid outside contractors.
by Qem 1y ago
It was due to a contractor that sold his password for peanuts. Not much opacity here. They shoud stop relying on poorly paid outside contractors.
- closewith 1y agoYes, a developer for an upstream dependency sold their credentials and the attackers were able to use that to create transactions in client banks' Pix infrastructure. > Not much opacity here. I think a black box implemented by a third party that can steal your funds is the definition of opacity. > They shoud stop relying on poorly paid outside contractors. A great deal of financial software is written by poorly paid contractors, but it's rare that one set of credentials can introduce systematic risk to a financial system.
- rbanffy 1y ago> They shoud stop relying on poorly paid outside contractors Besides paying decent wages, they should get rid of single points of failure, being them silicon or meat based.