4 ms·
> For sure, everywhere has culture if your definition of culture is sufficiently malleable. That's not what I wrote. I wrote that different folks think that c
by anamax 14y ago
> For sure, everywhere has culture if your definition of culture is sufficiently malleable.
That's not what I wrote. I wrote that different folks think that culture means different things, not that those folks have a changing definition of culture.
I get that you like NYC. However, I'll bet that you don't actually take advantage of the culture that you find essential all that often. You're paying for the ability to drop in on a broadway show every day even though you'll likely do it only once every 3-5 years.
I'm glad that you think that you're getting value for your money. How about being respectful of other people's choices wrt their money?
- Mvandenbergh 14y ago>You're paying for the ability to drop in on a broadway show every day even though you'll likely do it only once every 3-5 years. That's true for some people, and for them it's probably not a great idea to pay extra for a theoretical access to things they barely use. On the other hand, when I lived in London I went to see a play 2-3 times a month for the four years I lived there. If I moved back there, the theatre would be major reason why.
- michaelt 14y agoSorry, I guess I misunderstood what you wrote. I'm absolutely in favor of other people doing what they like with their money - diversity of entertainment choice is a great thing. For me that meant the city, where the higher density of customers makes it viable for IRL entertainment suppliers to operate further down the long tail of demand. The things I'm interested in are right down that long tail, so I can understand when rm999 found moving to a city has improved his/her quality of life.