4 ms·

> also apparently illogical but standardised hierarchy of Linux and the BSDs Hmm. /usr/bin /usr/sbin /bin /opt/bin ~/bin ~/.local/share/bin ~/op

> also apparently illogical but standardised hierarchy of Linux and the BSDs Hmm. /usr/bin /usr/sbin /bin /opt/bin ~/bin ~/.local/share/bin ~/opt/bin /include /lib/include /usr/include /usr/lib/include /usr/lib/clang/include And many more. Some directories are symlinks to another. Some of these directories do not exist on some distributions. Why are Linux people always so misguided and haughty?

qalmakka 1y ago
What's so hard to understand about "apparently illogical but standardised"? I never said it was beautiful, I said that despite being dumb [^1] at least there is a standard for it (https://refspecs.linuxfoundation.org/FHS_3.0/fhs/index.html https://refspecs.linuxfoundation.org/FHS_3.0/fhs/index.html). So yeah here are nonsensical directories like /opt, but at least they have a clear purpose, compared to the "well who cares, chuck it in there" approach NeXT/Apple had when tossing stuff around (sure, they've now "improved" that with SIP nowadays, but it's still a mess IMHO) [1]: for instance, "usr" contains libraries only due to the first PDP7 at bell labs having two disks, the first mounted as /, the second as /usr (user). When they ran out of space under /, they replicated the filesystem structure in their user disk, thus the birth of /usr/bin and the like. When /usr got too cluttered they created /home (or /usr/home, don't recall which)