5 ms·
That GIF weighs one third of a megabyte. You could literally fit a fully featured bespoke 2D/3D rendering engine in the same space. Now, it could probably be op
by Sharlin 1y ago
That GIF weighs one third of a megabyte. You could literally fit a fully featured bespoke 2D/3D rendering engine in the same space. Now, it could probably be optimized, but an aPNG would likely be vastly smaller. And these days aPNG is even reasonably widely supported! That said, an animated SVG would likely be the best option.
- xp84 1y agoWhat is your point? The random first GIF I found is enormous in pixel size and many frames, thus large in filesize, but a few dancing green blobs would be tiny. You don't need that one's 640px size to scale, and 2x will work perfectly fine.