3 ms·
Although there is a part on the use of AI in the legal market, but it is neither comprehensive, nor informative. A much better view of the law-specific state of
by District5524 1y ago
Although there is a part on the use of AI in the legal market, but it is neither comprehensive, nor informative.
A much better view of the law-specific state of the art models is available at https://www.vals.ai/vlair https://www.vals.ai/vlair (although registration is needed to access the report). That benchmark in the report clearly shows that there is not much added value or moat in the custom training of Harvey (costing supposedly ~5M$), while a Llama-based model can achieve quite similar performance.
Of course, no benchmark is perfect but it is still more informative than this blogpost, plus all the linked websites of the "legal" products linked that fail to give you the slightest idea of how they work. Besides claiming to be be disruptive...
- throwawayoldie 1y agoI think what the public really wants to know about Harvey is, is it named for Harvey Birdman, Attorney-At-Law?
- District5524 1y agothat would be fun, but what i've heard that it's named after Harvey Specter, from Suits. But that's not something they'll officially ever deny or confirm...