3 ms·
It is not AI generated and unlurker just finds articles with active conversations, it doesn't do any kind of comment automation. Upon reading it again, my comme
by jasonthorsness 1y ago
It is not AI generated and unlurker just finds articles with active conversations, it doesn't do any kind of comment automation. Upon reading it again, my comment in question maybe didn't add all that much; I just found the article interesting, so maybe I get where you are coming from.
As I mentioned in another reply, the weirdest thing about this comment chain is I saw this article on the front page, not unlurker (there wasn't much conversation yet when I posted so it would not have shown on the unlurker view I use).
Is "the author" a phrase AI prefers? Maybe I'll need to retire that along with "delve" and the em-dash and "you're absolutely right".
- _bahd 1y agoHa - thanks for answering this and clearing it up! Like I said, apologies if I was wrong. I think my AI slop paranoia had kicked in! No, honestly the comment was more than legitimate, I guess the author part made me think of LLMs summarizing research papers. Well, at least I've discovered unlurker out of this :)
- rat9988 1y agoYou should just say straightforward apoligies. Like I said, apologies if I was wrong doesn't cut it.