I think the statement is that "Nuclear basically makes no sense at all in 2025." That's slightly different from "they should have built solar" in 2005 when the

I think the statement is that "Nuclear basically makes no sense at all in 2025." That's slightly different from "they should have built solar" in 2005 when the last nuclear plant was started, according to https://world-nuclear.org/information-library/country-profiles/countries-a-f/finland https://world-nuclear.org/information-library/country-profil... It's 20 years later, and "not nuclear" isn't always "go 100% solar".