4 ms·
We better hope that we haven't awoken ChatGPT, because we haven't even attempted to keep it in a box. We're all rushing to build as many interconnections as pos
by aftbit 1y ago
We better hope that we haven't awoken ChatGPT, because we haven't even attempted to keep it in a box. We're all rushing to build as many interconnections as possible and give AI unilateral control of as many processes as we can.
- emp17344 1y agoI think you’re getting ChatGPT confused with Skynet. I’m still confused as to why so many people think these things are going to kill us all.
- block_dagger 1y agoI’m confused why you don’t.
- airstrike 1y agoAGI vs LLM
- emp17344 1y agoThe idea of a malicious AI, like in a sci-fi movie, seems entirely divorced from what LLMs actually are. Look at the HN front page - these things struggle to perform basic accounting tasks, and you think it’s secretly plotting to commit genocide?
- butlike 1y agoThe absurdity of your example made me chuckle, so thanks for that.
- krainboltgreene 1y agoFor the same reason you don't think a typewriter is going to kill us all. That's just not how it works.
- butlike 1y agoThE PeN iS MiGhTiEr ThAn ThE SwoooOOOOOOOorrrrrd... :P
- Workaccount2 1y agoBecause survival is a universal trait and humans aren't necessary to keep an AI "alive". There is no reason an AI wouldn't treat humans the same way we treat everything living below us. Our needs are priority and it would be wise to assume the AI will also give itself priority.
- emp17344 1y agoWhy do you think an AI would treat us any way at all? They don’t have feelings or emotions. They don’t have a persistent sense of self. They are incapable of engaging with us as sentient beings.
- ceejayoz 1y agoY'all are talking about two very different things with the same term. LLMs are not AGI. Both are "AI".
- tripzilch 1y ago> treat humans the same way we treat everything living below us. "below us"? speak for yourself, because that's supremacist's reasoning.