> Austin's "value of solar" is the opposite of net metering. Yes, that is exactly my point. And yes, I'd love it if I got paid more as a homeowner. But Austin

> Austin's "value of solar" is the opposite of net metering. Yes, that is exactly my point. And yes, I'd love it if I got paid more as a homeowner. But Austin is basically paying me wholesale rates for my power I send to the grid, which fundamentally makes sense from an economics perspective. Again, net metering is inherently infeasible for the power company without a vast reconfiguring of how grid electricity is charged.