It's the same with sheep. Many people believe, falsely, that the plural of sheep is sheeps. Just ask any drunk. Those with a classical education incorporating p

It's the same with sheep. Many people believe, falsely, that the plural of sheep is sheeps. Just ask any drunk. Those with a classical education incorporating proto-Germanic literature, or a marketing degree, may feel an urge to amend this to sheepą and sheepō. Persnickety biologists may hide behind ovis which is problematic under any of the greco-latin declensions because sheep are mammals. I myself have adapted latterly to an abundance mindset and will refer in the plural simply to a flock and it follows that the singular of sheep is, quite naturally, monoflock. And I'm experimenting with a numerical trailer to express the cardinality, thus, flock(2)