Sorry, but your comparisons are a bit off. Apple might be inspired by Sony, yet innovated on top (like any good innovator does). What Samsung did are cheap copi

Sorry, but your comparisons are a bit off. Apple might be inspired by Sony, yet innovated on top (like any good innovator does). What Samsung did are cheap copies (as well as HP and Asus for their ultrabooks). This has nothing to do with industry "inspiration" this is plain copying: http://static6.businessinsider.com/image/4dadf745ccd1d5aa3f1a0000/samsung-vs-apple-icons.jpg http://static6.businessinsider.com/image/4dadf745ccd1d5aa3f1... Downvote me if you want. I don't agree with what Apple does. However, if something like that would happen to me, I would be really angry. Samsungs S-Voice anybody?? Samsung is a great hardware company, yet they are cheap copy-cats when it comes to UI design /services. The patents are ridiculous (as any software patents are). This holds for anybody suing, be it Apple, Samsung, Motorola (Google), etc. Keep in mind that Apple did not start this mess. I actually believe that these lawsuits will let us get more innovation (as people need to come up with fresh designs like Nokia and Microsoft did ... and won't copy like Samsung).