>Now we can churn out text at rates unprecedented and the original problem, no one reading, is left untouched. I think you miss my point a bit. Any text that

>Now we can churn out text at rates unprecedented and the original problem, no one reading, is left untouched. I think you miss my point a bit. Any text that can be churned out at unprecedented rates likely isn't worth reading (or writing, or looking at, or listening to), and anyone consuming this stuff already isn't doing much thinking. You can lead a horse etc etc