3 ms·
If you’re indeed “going without” you have no obligation to fund the creators?
by Henchman21 1y ago
If you’re indeed “going without” you have no obligation to fund the creators?
- tshaddox 1y agoIs the goal to fund more creators, or just to have fewer people with a supposed obligation to fund creators?
- Henchman21 1y agoWell, I dunno what goals you have, but my goals include paying for the content I read and not paying for the content I don't. This is something I already do. Paying multiple parties for access to content isn't some maddening problem where the masses are crying out for a solution. Perhaps I'm utterly missing the point in this thread?
- tshaddox 1y agoThat's well and good, but I don't mean your goals for yourself. I'm asking what our goals are (or what they ought to be) for how people broadly interact with creative works which are easily copyable.