I am sick and tired of the hundreds of multiple trees of comments wasted on misunderstanding plain English terms that another meaning was tacked on and the side

I am sick and tired of the hundreds of multiple trees of comments wasted on misunderstanding plain English terms that another meaning was tacked on and the sides that people take for words used in a casual context. Examples: Copyright infringement vs. Stealing open source vs. Open Source free software vs. Free sofware Viruses vs. trojans patent troll Why can't we have a wiki or manifesto or something where we all agree on some definitions? It's funny how otherwise highly intelligent people(and programmers used to strict programming languages, no less) can't decide on one definition and resort to nitpicking. Back to the topic: >Indeed, you won't need them, others came with a plenty of fresh ideas: http://dewith.com/2012/its-not-just-phones/ http://dewith.com/2012/its-not-just-phones/ Please, someone put a stop with the cherry picking 'before and after' memes. Here's the Sony x505 from 2004 with the wedge shaped look. http://news.cnet.com/8301-13924_3-20020535-64.html http://news.cnet.com/8301-13924_3-20020535-64.html Why wasn't that included in the picture on the site? Because it doesn't fit with the agenda they're trying to push. Not to mention that there are tons of laptops nowadays that don't look like Macbooks. So now does that mean Apple copied Sony? Industries borrow look and feel all the time and make incremental changes all the time. E.g. the fashion industry or the car industry. Edit: Hell, even Apple had a side project to explore how a Sony inspired iPhone design would look like. (yes, I know they didn't go to market with it and did have earlier prototypes that looked like the later iPhones but weren't Sony inspired) http://arstechnica.com/apple/2012/07/early-iphone-prototypes-drew-inspiration-from-sony-ipod-mini/ http://arstechnica.com/apple/2012/07/early-iphone-prototypes...