3 ms·
Wasn’t Microsoft just recently using Chinese people living in China to administer DOD servers? I would guess they use Sharepoint inside the DOD?
by shrubble 1y ago
Wasn’t Microsoft just recently using Chinese people living in China to administer DOD servers? I would guess they use Sharepoint inside the DOD?
- polarbear67 1y agoLink: https://www.reuters.com/world/us/microsoft-stop-using-engineers-china-tech-support-us-military-hegseth-orders-2025-07-18/ https://www.reuters.com/world/us/microsoft-stop-using-engine...
- gkanai 1y agoThat is... crazy. Would the CCP allow their cloud infra to be administrated by US staff in the US? Never.
- kevin_thibedeau 1y agoThe US doesn't either. Someone didn't comply with existing law here. I've been on a program where uncleared people from another business unit were used as internal labor loan for export controlled work. One of them was belatedly discovered to be a Canadian citizen and they were retasked the next day. There are strict rules in this domain. It's just that nobody gives a fuck about paying for an IT cost center to do things securely. Chalk up another win for outsourcing and moving to the cloud for cost savings.
- theteapot 1y agoSays this in the article: > A programming flaw in its cloud services also allowed China-backed hackers to steal email from federal officials. On Friday, Microsoft said it would stop using China-based engineers to support Defense Department cloud-computing programs after a report by investigative outlet ProPublica revealed the practice, prompting Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to order a review of Pentagon cloud deals.
- paulwilsondev 1y agoExcuse me??
- samtheprogram 1y agoAbsolutely insane. Especially in light of their layoffs. Should be criminal. According to another comment in the thread, it is?
- 999900000999 1y agoMicrosoft only has a market cap if 3.7 trillion. They can't afford to hire domestically. Anyway, from what I can tell being in this industry, a lot of things need to be explicitly illegal to stop companies from doing it. Edit: The penalities also have to be meaningful. There's a lot of "technically not legal, but sue us lol" going on. "Hey, this is a really really stupid idea." Isn't going to stop a middle manager from trying to come in under budget. At most MS will pay a nominal fine, and proceed to learn nothing.
- 1718627440 1y agoMaybe instead of fines, large companies should be forbidden to do any new contracts for some months. That would be a larger incentive and also comprehensible to sales people.
- 999900000999 1y agoIn which magical country do you suspect this would be enforced ? Microsoft also has a captive market here. Realistically you aren't going to migrate millions of employees and servers to another tech stack, even over something egregiously bad. Something like storing cleared data really should be handled 100% internally with an open source stack that's regularly audited. But that sounds really difficult, even if it would be cheaper or the same price in the long run.
- 1718627440 1y ago
- p_ing 1y agoThere is a DoD version of M365 which has SPO, but that isn't what the article is discussing.
- newsclues 1y agoRevert to the typewriters for security
- jbaber 1y agohttps://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2015/10/how-soviets-used-ibm-selectric-keyloggers-to-spy-on-us-diplomats/ https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2015/10/how-s...