3 ms·

But it's understandable why an org would prefer that to having to maintain and manage the 18 things, right? It's a hard sell. I'm not saying that wouldn't be

But it's understandable why an org would prefer that to having to maintain and manage the 18 things, right? It's a hard sell. I'm not saying that wouldn't be better, but it makes sense why an org would be reluctant. Again, not a fan of Sharepoint myself, but from an org's viewpoint, moving to Linux raises more problems than it solves.

bangaladore 1y ago
It's understandable, but it doesn't excuse how poorly everything actually works and how confusing it is to use and administrate. To some extent I think Microsoft is largely in the business of building solutions for problems that don't exist. Most orgs are probably perfectly fine with a document management system + desktop word application and then a commercial NAS for bulk storage / backups.