3 ms·
No actually the proof is in basically every benchmark, which are all super well known, so the burden of proof is on the OP
by mountainriver 1y ago
No actually the proof is in basically every benchmark, which are all super well known, so the burden of proof is on the OP
- ath3nd 1y agoIt's funny how that works in your mind. There comes a snake oil salesmen and says that LLMs are the bees'knees and you just take as a given without any critical thought. But when people actually have proof that LLMs are nothing special and even reduce productivity (by 19% in experienced developers): https://secondthoughts.ai/p/ai-coding-slowdown https://secondthoughts.ai/p/ai-coding-slowdown you are screaming to the heavens for proof. I am the last to stop the AI fanbase from outsourcing their critical thinking and some of their wallet to a fancy autocomplete, that means more work for the rest of us that actually do the thinking. LLM vibe-"engineers" will be fleeced $$$ when Anthropic actually starts wanting to be profitable: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44598254#44602695 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44598254#44602695 Their skills deteriorate, and so does their critical thinking: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/15/1/6 https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/15/1/6 And I just can't stop giggling imagining their workday when Claude is down. LGTM is not a sustainable career choice, people.