4 ms·
Even if we accept the author’s contention that the downside risk is very low (and plenty of other comments explain why that is a bad idea), they make no case at
by compiler-guy 1y ago
Even if we accept the author’s contention that the downside risk is very low (and plenty of other comments explain why that is a bad idea), they make no case at all for the benefits. If there is no benefit to keeping it, then there is no downside to deleting it.
- recursivecaveat 1y agoDefinitely. I mean if you believe in some future public health benefit or whatever (right or wrong) sure. Very weird to hear someone emphatically voice support for a position and articulate no upsides at all. Imagine if somebody ran up to you and said "don't open that letter!" and then calmly explained it was probably junk mail anyways.