4 ms·

Which cases do you mean specifically?

• cardamomo 1y ago
  I think immibis's comment (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44639370 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44639370) has a couple great examples of what I'm talking about. To add on, the Court has also allowed the executive branch to essentially shutter federal departments that were created by Congress, such as the Department of Education. They also ruled that lower federal courts cannot issue nationwide injunctions to stop executive action, thereby ending a check on presidential power that has vexed both parties when in office.
  • caseysoftware 1y ago
    > To add on, the Court has also allowed the executive branch to essentially shutter federal departments that were created by Congress, such as the Department of Education. The Dept of Ed had ~4200 employees and they laid of ~1400. It is not "essentially shuttered" currently regardless of the goal. Ref: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Department_of_Education https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Department_of_Ed... The important question is: "Can they fulfill their legally mandated obligations with the smaller staff?" If the answer is "yes" then we saved money and still did the job. If the answer is "no" then we have a problem. So far I haven't seen anyone identify "here are the legally mandated obligations that won't be fulfilled any longer" which would be useful and could be compelling.
    • giardini 1y ago
      When do you think he will shut the entire DOE down?