4 ms·
You seem to be ignoring that once land values reach some kind of floor it will be entirely sensible to build houses. Land values going up leads to FOMO, and goi
by Glyptodon 1y ago
You seem to be ignoring that once land values reach some kind of floor it will be entirely sensible to build houses. Land values going up leads to FOMO, and going down leads to the reverse of FOMO, IE fear that the bottom hasn't been reached.
Clearly it is correct to short, but short positions expire - they are definitionally short term.
That said, the behavior is pretty expected: the current operators are operating on in inflated land value cost because the market has become distorted due to lack of supply. Altering the market by injecting supply will drive down land value and cause operators with money stuck at the current equilibrium to lose money or fail. But it poses no issue to operation or new entrants at the new market equilibrium. If it operates like a market should operators should be happy to begin providing houses on land at the new equilibrium as soon as it's reached. However fear of not knowing when it's been reached will mean that it does to take time settle.
- doctorpangloss 1y agoOkay, but what actually happens is exactly what happened with the tariffs: a bunch of bold statements about policy benefits, huge market drops, followed by chickening out back to the status quo. You are talking about policy effects that would take a decade to realize, a decade of huge pain to investors… I cannot comprehend how “Rube Goldberg machine that leads to long term benefits, guaranteed short term catastrophe” is a policy idea.
- Glyptodon 1y agoI trend towards 3 to 5 years over a decade in my thinking, but if investors never seriously think that risks or slow or down markets like mentioned are possible the market is absolutely going to be completely misvalued until the mechanisms that prop it up get overextended or weighed down to the point of failure.