3 ms·

"Most of the time" is not good enough. Door should only open if no metals detected.

• wtcactus 1y ago
  Why though? Why are we going to force society to spend hundreds of millions of dollars in equipment, wasted time and personal costs, to avoid a one in a million possibility that someone not caring about clear warning signs gets injured?
  • snvzz 1y ago
    If your argument is money, you are overlooking that a metal detector is really cheap, a practically invisible cost when next to that of the MRI machine. Thus, it makes sense for regulations to mandate such a life-saving metal detector.
    • wtcactus 1y ago
      It's money, wasted time, and more personnel to guard, handle and fix the metal detector. I think we have way too many regulations as it is, and it's bringing society as a hole down.
  • deleted 1y ago
    [deleted]