3 ms·
Huge flaw in his reasoning: > Group chats, dating apps, emails — or in Byron’s and Cabot’s case, simply being in public with no intention to be filmed — should
by calibas 1y ago
Huge flaw in his reasoning:
> Group chats, dating apps, emails — or in Byron’s and Cabot’s case, simply being in public with no intention to be filmed — should not be subject to public judgement.
He's equating things where you should have an expectation of privacy with "simply" cheating on one's spouse in a public space.
And why does intention matter? People should have expectations of privacy in public spaces if they don't intend to be seen? Is that really the claim here?
- mingus88 1y agoIf you have an expectation of privacy in any of those, you are mistaken. One of the first things I told my daughter when I gave her her first cell phone is never text anything you don’t want someone to screenshot and send it to everyone you know. Sure enough, literally yesterday she got a text from friend A asking if my daughter liked her more than friend B. Friend B sent the message from friend A’s phone as a test. The year is 2025 and sadly the only place I have an expectation of privacy anymore is inside my own house verbally speaking to my family. And even then I expect my location to be available to more people than I care to admit.