> That's not a clarification of what you are referring to, that is just stating You're right, that was a conclusion. And the context was clear from my original

> That's not a clarification of what you are referring to, that is just stating You're right, that was a conclusion. And the context was clear from my original post. To be precise, when I describe that ideology, the concrete example I have in mind is the kind of burdensome framework detailed in the RCSR. My conclusion about that framework is that it ignores reality and causes harm, despite its intentions. and 'Tough news' is the evidence for that specific conclusion.