4 ms·
One, you're adding intent to a process that has no intent. It's not reflected- it's just not used (and thus absorbed). If the plant has more energy that it nee
by privatelypublic 1y ago
One, you're adding intent to a process that has no intent.
It's not reflected- it's just not used (and thus absorbed). If the plant has more energy that it needs already to produce offspring... what pressures exist to produce more?
- selcuka 1y agoIt is reflected. That's why plants are green. You seem to have missed the context of my reply: > an extinction level event that filtered sunlight for a long time, removing green The lack of green sunlight would not necessarily result in a mutation that reflects green. There is no evolutionary pressure for reflecting/not using something that doesn't exist. In fact, it would be adding intent to a process that has no intent.