3 ms·
Well... my understanding has always been that 1.1 == 1.1.0 but 1.1 != 1.10; i.e. these aren't supposed to be interpreted in the decimal sense. Declaring 1.1 ==
by quibono 1y ago
Well... my understanding has always been that 1.1 == 1.1.0 but 1.1 != 1.10; i.e. these aren't supposed to be interpreted in the decimal sense. Declaring 1.1 == 1.10 would be very confusing to me but I understand I might be biased.
Also, I wish everyone settled on SEVMER already. There are some bizarre versioning schemes out there. I get that sometimes those are needed but do we really need the likes of Cisco versions?
- miohtama 1y agoPerl would be never bizarre or confusing
- perching_aix 1y agoPretty fond of calendar versioning as of late myself. [0] [0] https://calver.org https://calver.org
- encom 1y agoNot a huge fan, except in situations mentioned in "When to use calver" from your link. However... I'm sure we can all agree that anything is better than the Mozilla/Google "major versions are now minor" arms race, that are now up to absurd numbers. Except for projects using code names. Is Wonky Wallaby more recent than Halfbaked Hamster? Fuck knows. Debian has been especially annoying with this, since the last three releases were b-words: buster, bullseye, bookworm. I can never remember. Please stop.