41 ms·
Or limit people to owning 1 or 2 homes. Does it make sense for one person to own 100 homes and rent them out? Think about the distinction that permanently creat
by electriclove 1y ago
Or limit people to owning 1 or 2 homes. Does it make sense for one person to own 100 homes and rent them out? Think about the distinction that permanently creates for people who live in that community. Something like that only benefits the landlord class.
- amanaplanacanal 1y agoWhat to do with the people who would rather rent than own?
- electriclove 1y agoLet them rent. There are many good reasons why someone would want to rent. Limiting the number of homes one can own spreads it out.
- vel0city 1y agoHow can they rent when there is practically zero supply of rental units because we've now made it illegal to own multiple properties?
- electriclove 1y agoThink shades instead of black/white. Our current rules can be tweaked. For example: 1-2 properties can be considered primary homes and get all tax benefits 3-4 properties allowed but no tax benefits 5+ properties not allowed
- jabjq 1y ago[flagged]
- electriclove 1y agoSeriously? How?