4 ms·
Well the most important information is missing: what was your ROI ? :D
by poulpy123 1y ago
Well the most important information is missing: what was your ROI ? :D
- kqr 1y agoI'm going to assume this project is at best a few years old, so return over index is more likely to be an indicator of overbetting (taking on too much risk) than a performance indicator. Backtesting would be more useful. Of course, LLMs cannot be backtested since they know the past. This system is impossible to test. I would be hesitant to trust it.
- TuringNYC 1y ago>> I'm going to assume this project is at best a few years old, so return over index is more likely to be an indicator of overbetting (taking on too much risk) than a performance indicator. Best metric here would be a Sharpe Ratio and drawdown details. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sharpe_ratio https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sharpe_ratio > This system is impossible to test. I would be hesitant to trust it. Disagree. Best test would be a paper test going forward, audited by a common platform.
- kqr 1y agoAny forward test depends on market assumptions. I'm not a practitioner, and as a layperson I wouldn't know whose assumptions to trust.
- tmaly 1y agoit looks like the code was committed a week ago. I do not see an iterative history on the code
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- haniehz 1y agoI didn’t build this to beat the market...it started as a way to reduce my own decision fatigue and make sure I wasn’t missing obvious signals. That said, it’s more of a research agent than a trading bot. For ROI, it’s not auto-trading, but it has helped me avoid a few bad calls and made my reports more consistent and thorough.