4 ms·
>>fake humanity I'd rather be treated nice by a bot, than be abused by a human. Make whatever of this you will. Though I know the bot is not sentient. I'd rat
by kamaal 1y ago
>>fake humanity
I'd rather be treated nice by a bot, than be abused by a human. Make whatever of this you will.
Though I know the bot is not sentient. I'd rather chat with it, than some human who doesn't talk well.
Im guessing the future of relationships works the same way. All the best competing with a bot that makes you feel nice, than a spouse/partner who doesn't.
It will be a hard era to come for people who misbehave. The tolerance for that sort of stuff is going to go away entirely.
- bluefirebrand 1y ago> It will be a hard era to come for people who misbehave. The tolerance for that sort of stuff is going to go away entirely This is perhaps one of the most fascist sentences I've ever read No more "misbehaving" only perfect conformity
- kamaal 1y agoI dont know what this means. Are you saying people who don't willingly offer to become punching bags for abusive people are fascists?
- Timwi 1y agoYeah sorry, but I think you massively misread that take. It's not about conformity. It's about keeping yourself liked so that people will voluntarily interact with you. You can no longer get away with being a narcissistic arsehole. I'm not sure I agree that's gonna happen, I'm just trying to paraphrase what I think the GP meant.
- jlaternman 1y agoI see what you mean as in no tolerance for abusive people that can currently get away with overtly treating people like shit, but I do immediately think “that generally captures the more trivial abusers.” The most destructive ones tend to be covert, and more often will appear as friendly and polite as LLMs when setting up their targets. That makes me wonder if it will create a harder or easier era for them. Not something I’ve thought on before to have formed an opinion, but it makes me wonder.