> Maybe those people are right, though? I think the discussion starts from a place that assumes other people are wrong. I think this is the right approach. We

> Maybe those people are right, though? I think the discussion starts from a place that assumes other people are wrong. I think this is the right approach. We know that io_uring has a somewhat significant history of critical security issues. It's not enough just to point out that "these 3 critical CVEs were fixed in the last 12 months, it's secure now!" Reputation and trust has to be built over a long period of time.